![]() General: Executive Selection with Structured Interview for Suzanne Example 4/15/2003
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Your company has identified a set of competencies
important to job success.
Competency in an area is the result of many factors working together, which include innate characteristics (natural ability, personality) and learned characteristics (knowledge, experience and skills) as is presented in the following chart. People who have the right competencies or who have a good potential for developing these competencies will be able to do the right things (behaviors) to produce the desired results (effective outcomes). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The ASSESS system has evaluated this candidate's
work related personality and abilities (if ability tests were
administered) in relation to the Competency Model described on the
following pages.
The following report provides detailed results and judgments about how these innate characteristics may facilitate or hinder the display or development of the desired competencies and, ultimately, job effectiveness. Also provided is a competency-oriented interview protocol to use to evaluate the skills, knowledge and other learned characteristics important to this job, as well as a general model for making a good decision from all sources of information. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Since abilities can impact most competencies,
they are reported separately here.
The following results are based on your performance on standardized ability tests. They are presented as percentile comparisons to professional norms (people who, for the most part, have an education at or beyond the college undergraduate level) and to general population norms (people who, for the most part, have a high school education). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| With a few exceptions, if this person is being considered for a position normally requiring a college degree, you should pay most attention to the professional norm group comparisons. However, if the candidate has limited formal education or if a college degree is not required, the general population comparisons may be more appropriate. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The candidate completed the following ability test(s): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intellectual Ability Scores
Compared to:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | While she should be able to reason through
verbal and quantitative information to solve problems as quickly or more
quickly than the average person, she may be somewhat slower or less
skilled than the typical professional.
Her critical thinking abilities appear to be as good as the typical professional and better than the average person. She should be able to understand most complex written problems, evaluate the relative merits of various interpretations of the information presented, and come to sound conclusions. She should have little difficulty solving problems that involve complex, abstract information. She should also be quick to grasp new ideas and solve problems that are outside her usual experience. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General: Executive
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
*Competencies not strongly impacted by the personality characteristics measured by ASSESS. Development feedback and suggestions may be obtained for these competencies using the Assess360 system. |
| |||
| Reading The Competency Graphs: | |||
| |||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Visioning
Identifying long-term goals and championing the implementation of different or alternative ideas. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| In-Depth Problem
Solving And Analysis
Solving difficult problems through careful and systematic evaluation of information, possible alternatives and consequences. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Her tendency to be impulsive and unrestrained may reduce the value of
her reflective nature. At times, she may decide or act without fully
considering the underlying issues. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Championing
Change
Taking action to support and implement change initiatives effectively. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Driving For
Results
Challenging, pushing the organization and themselves to excel and achieve. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The combination of her high self-reliance but low follow-through may
lead her to take on more than she will actually accomplish. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Influencing And
Persuading
Convincing others to adopt a course of action. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
While the above dimensions can address part of what is needed to
effectively persuade or influence others, ASSESS cannot evaluate her oral
communication ability nor the quality of her arguments. Please take
special care to evaluate these issues in the interview. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Managing
Others
Directing and leading others to accomplish organizational goals and objectives. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The combination of her assertive style and slow work pace may result in
her being perceived as more "talk" than "do" by those she leads. The combination of her high assertiveness and low need to be liked
suggests a very competitive nature. While this could help drive her group
to high levels of achievement, it could also lead to unnecessary conflict
and detract from group morale if not properly controlled. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Organizational
Savvy
Recognizing and understanding organizational politics and working within organizational dynamics to accomplish objectives. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
While the dimensions addressed above by ASSESS are good indicators of
the personality factors that will influence the effective display of this
competency, perhaps the most important issues involve the understanding of
the political and social environment of the organization. Please take
special care to address these issues during the interview. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following structured interview will guide you through a series of behaviorally based questions to help you better evaluate this candidate's ability to display each competency. It also provides additional interview suggestions based on this candidate's personality results. Take notes in the space provided and record your summary rating for each competency area. For additional, more detailed information on conducting good behavior-based interviews, please visit the ASSESS managers resource website at https://www.bigby.com/systems/assessv2/System/Reports/www.bigby.com/systems/assessv2/resources/manager.
Review the candidate's resume and be familiar with his/her background and experience. Review the candidate's ASSESS results. Review the interview questions and additional personality probes.
|
BACKGROUND & HISTORY
Listen and probe for accomplishments, grades, how he/she chose college/major, classes he/she liked or disliked, involvement in outside activities, work experience during school, etc., and probe for how they relate to the job. Walk me through your work history. Listen and probe for milestones, accomplishments, relationships with co-workers and supervisors, tasks he/she liked or disliked, work environments he/she liked or disliked, reasons for leaving each job, etc. and probe for how prior experience has prepared him/her for this job. NOTES:
Suggested transition to competency-oriented interview questions: "I'm now going to ask you to describe some specific situations from your past experience. For each, tell me about the situation itself, what you did specifically, and the results or outcome of your actions." |
Visioning: Identifying long-term goals and championing the implementation of different or alternative ideas. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
In-Depth Problem Solving And Analysis: Solving difficult problems through careful and systematic evaluation of information, possible alternatives and consequences. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Championing Change: Taking action to support and implement change initiatives effectively. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Driving For Results: Challenging, pushing the organization and themselves to excel and achieve. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Influencing And Persuading: Convincing others to adopt a course of action. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Managing Others: Directing and leading others to accomplish organizational goals and objectives. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Organizational Savvy: Recognizing and understanding organizational politics and working within organizational dynamics to accomplish objectives. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Business Acumen*: Understanding general business and financial concepts, understanding the company's business, and using both general and specific knowledge to be effective. | ||
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Integrity*: Upholding a high standard of fairness and ethics in everyday words and actions. | ||
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Courage Of Convictions*: Having the personal courage to address difficult issues in the face of potential opposition. | ||
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Presentation Skills*: Having the skills to effectively communicate to an audience in a formal setting. | ||
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Continuous Learning*: Striving to expand knowledge and refine skills through education and training. Inspiring others to develop and refine knowledge and skills relevant to their work. | ||
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Closing the Interview
Ensure that the candidate feels that he/she has been able to give you a complete and accurate picture of him/herself. Explain the next steps in the process and timeframe as appropriate. Thank the candidate for his/her time and close the interview. |
Good selection decisions require careful consideration of all the available information (education, training, experience, skills, abilities, personality, etc.) from as many different credible sources as possible (interviews, reference checks, background checks, ASSESS results, etc.) against a clear specification of what is needed or desired in the job. Use the following chart to evaluate the candidate on each of the competencies of the Model. Carefully consider each competency before making your overall judgement. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
While the ASSESS Development Report for this competency model provides detailed suggestions for helping this person to manage potential problem areas, in this section of the Selection Report we provide a few additional recommendations to help you to effectively manage this person. Each of the following management suggestions identifies a potential problem area for this candidate and recommends an approach to optimizing his/her effectiveness on the job. For some suggestions, reference books and other resources are listed for additional recommendations. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
Additional Suggestions For coaching resources and additional suggestions on how to best manage and develop this person, please visit the ASSESS Manager's Website at http://www.bigby.com/systems/ASSESSv2/resources/welcome.asp. In addition, developmental suggestions for this person can be obtained from the ASSESS Developmental Report. This report is designed to provide constructive feedback and extensive developmental suggestions to the individual assessed (books to read, courses to take, developmental experiences or assignments to negotiate with the boss, etc.). You can use these developmental suggestions in coaching sessions to help the candidate capitalize on key strengths and compensate for potential weaknesses. Check with your test administrator or Human Resources representative to see how you may obtain a Developmental Report on this individual. The following books are general resources that may be useful in coaching this person or other people in your organization. Masterful Coaching: Extraordinary Results by Impacting People and the Way They Think and Work Together by Robert Hargrove, Pfeiffer & Company, 1995. Leader As Coach: Strategies for Coaching & Developing Others by David B. Peterson & Mary Dee Hicks, Personnel Decisions International, 1996. Action Coaching: How to Leverage Individual Performance for Company Success by David L. Dotlich & Peter C. Cairo, Jossey-Bass, 1999. Results-Based Leadership by David Ulrich, Jack Zenger, & Norman Smallwood, Harvard Business School Press, 1999. Leadership: The ASTD Trainers Sourcebook by Anne F. Coyle, McGraw-Hill, 1996. Coaching for Improved Work Performance by Ferdinand Fournies, McGraw-Hill, 2000. | |||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||