![]() General: Professional or Individual Contributor Selection with Structured Interview for Suzanne Example 4/15/2003
| |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Your company has identified a set of competencies
important to job success.
Competency in an area is the result of many factors working together, which include innate characteristics (natural ability, personality) and learned characteristics (knowledge, experience and skills) as is presented in the following chart. People who have the right competencies or who have a good potential for developing these competencies will be able to do the right things (behaviors) to produce the desired results (effective outcomes). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The ASSESS system has evaluated this candidate's
work related personality and abilities (if ability tests were
administered) in relation to the Competency Model described on the
following pages.
The following report provides detailed results and judgments about how these innate characteristics may facilitate or hinder the display or development of the desired competencies and, ultimately, job effectiveness. Also provided is a competency-oriented interview protocol to use to evaluate the skills, knowledge and other learned characteristics important to this job, as well as a general model for making a good decision from all sources of information. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Since abilities can impact most competencies,
they are reported separately here.
The following results are based on your performance on standardized ability tests. They are presented as percentile comparisons to professional norms (people who, for the most part, have an education at or beyond the college undergraduate level) and to general population norms (people who, for the most part, have a high school education). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| With a few exceptions, if this person is being considered for a position normally requiring a college degree, you should pay most attention to the professional norm group comparisons. However, if the candidate has limited formal education or if a college degree is not required, the general population comparisons may be more appropriate. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The candidate completed the following ability test(s): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Intellectual Ability Scores
Compared to:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | While she should be able to reason through
verbal and quantitative information to solve problems as quickly or more
quickly than the average person, she may be somewhat slower or less
skilled than the typical professional.
Her critical thinking abilities appear to be as good as the typical professional and better than the average person. She should be able to understand most complex written problems, evaluate the relative merits of various interpretations of the information presented, and come to sound conclusions. She should have little difficulty solving problems that involve complex, abstract information. She should also be quick to grasp new ideas and solve problems that are outside her usual experience. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
General: Professional or Individual Contributor
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
*Competencies not strongly impacted by the personality characteristics measured by ASSESS. Development feedback and suggestions may be obtained for these competencies using the Assess360 system. |
| |||
| Reading The Competency Graphs: | |||
| |||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Decisive
Judgment
Making good decisions in a timely and confident manner. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Her assertive style may allow her to convince others of her decisions,
even when they are poorly thought out. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Adapting To
Change
Adapting to changing situations and restructuring tasks and priorities as changes occur within the business and organization. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Planning And
Organizing
Effectively organizing and planning work according to organizational needs by defining objectives and anticipating needs and priorities. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Delivering
Results
Maintaining a high level of commitment to personally getting things done. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The combination of her high self-reliance and low follow-through may
lead her to take on more than she will actually accomplish. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Resilience
Effectively dealing with work related problems, pressure, and stress in a professional and positive manner. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Teamwork And
Collaboration
Effectively working and collaborating with others toward a common goal. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interpersonal
Communication
Communicating clearly and effectively with people inside and outside of the organization. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The combination of her high assertiveness and low self-control may
cause her to be overbearing in her communications with others. People may
perceive her as tactless and inconsiderate. While the above personality dimensions measured by ASSESS will have
some effect on the delivery of her communications, other factors such as
language skills, communications training, and knowledge of the topic are
likely to have as much, if not more, impact. Please take special care to
evaluate these factors during the interview. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following structured interview will guide you through a series of behaviorally based questions to help you better evaluate this candidate's ability to display each competency. It also provides additional interview suggestions based on this candidate's personality results. Take notes in the space provided and record your summary rating for each competency area. For additional, more detailed information on conducting good behavior-based interviews, please visit the ASSESS managers resource website at https://www.bigby.com/systems/assessv2/System/Reports/www.bigby.com/systems/assessv2/resources/manager.
Review the candidate's resume and be familiar with his/her background and experience. Review the candidate's ASSESS results. Review the interview questions and additional personality probes.
|
BACKGROUND & HISTORY
Listen and probe for accomplishments, grades, how he/she chose college/major, classes he/she liked or disliked, involvement in outside activities, work experience during school, etc., and probe for how they relate to the job. Walk me through your work history. Listen and probe for milestones, accomplishments, relationships with co-workers and supervisors, tasks he/she liked or disliked, work environments he/she liked or disliked, reasons for leaving each job, etc. and probe for how prior experience has prepared him/her for this job. NOTES:
Suggested transition to competency-oriented interview questions: "I'm now going to ask you to describe some specific situations from your past experience. For each, tell me about the situation itself, what you did specifically, and the results or outcome of your actions." |
Decisive Judgment: Making good decisions in a timely and confident manner. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Adapting To Change: Adapting to changing situations and restructuring tasks and priorities as changes occur within the business and organization. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Planning And Organizing: Effectively organizing and planning work according to organizational needs by defining objectives and anticipating needs and priorities. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Delivering Results: Maintaining a high level of commitment to personally getting things done. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Resilience: Effectively dealing with work related problems, pressure, and stress in a professional and positive manner. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Teamwork And Collaboration: Effectively working and collaborating with others toward a common goal. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Interpersonal Communication: Communicating clearly and effectively with people inside and outside of the organization. | ||
Additional special probes based on ASSESS results:
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Functional Acumen*: Having the skills, knowledge and abilities necessary to be effective in the specific functional content of a job. | ||
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Integrity*: Upholding a high standard of fairness and ethics in everyday words and actions. | ||
NOTES: (details of the situation, actions by the candidate, and the resulting outcomes)
|
Closing the Interview
Ensure that the candidate feels that he/she has been able to give you a complete and accurate picture of him/herself. Explain the next steps in the process and timeframe as appropriate. Thank the candidate for his/her time and close the interview. |
Good selection decisions require careful consideration of all the available information (education, training, experience, skills, abilities, personality, etc.) from as many different credible sources as possible (interviews, reference checks, background checks, ASSESS results, etc.) against a clear specification of what is needed or desired in the job. Use the following chart to evaluate the candidate on each of the competencies of the Model. Carefully consider each competency before making your overall judgement. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
While the ASSESS Development Report for this competency model provides detailed suggestions for helping this person to manage potential problem areas, in this section of the Selection Report we provide a few additional recommendations to help you to effectively manage this person. Each of the following management suggestions identifies a potential problem area for this candidate and recommends an approach to optimizing his/her effectiveness on the job. For some suggestions, reference books and other resources are listed for additional recommendations. | ||
| ||